anyone want to play odst on crater, rally point, securtiy zone, chasm ten, or last exit?more ppl the faster it goesGT J0E VS Y0Uadd me and send message lettinhg me know you from gamespot the 0's in my name are numbersfirefight odst anyone? 200k achievments~ ...
wrong forum go to the odst forumhttp://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/halo3untitledodstgame/forum.html?tag=tabs;forumsfirefight odst anyone? 200k achievments~ ...
I need help 2 players to play with me and my friend tomorrow Oct. 23, Saturday to get the 4 players over xbox live on Heroic achievement: My gamertag is Sticker Peck Up, feel free to add me thanks.
[QUOTE=''StickerPeckUp'']I need help 2 players to play with me and my friend tomorrow Oct. 23, Saturday to get the 4 players over xbox live on Heroic achievement: My gamertag is Sticker Peck Up, feel free to add me thanks.[/QUOTE] Have fun with that one man, took me and my friends like 2 hours before we finally past the last set. Also, my suggest would be to do it on Lost Platoon. The strategy that worked easy for us was 2 people in a Warthog, 1 in a chopper and one with the laser taking out wraiths.
[QUOTE=''HydraRizlim'']wrong forum go to the odst forumhttp://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/halo3untitledodstgame/forum.html?tag=tabs;forums[/QUOTE]
how is this the wrong forum? but there is already a stickied topic with hundreds of firefight gamertags, check there
Thursday, April 15, 2010
Xbox 360 freezing....
Is it possible that the Hard Drive unit could cause the console to freeze? I tested a couple games and they freeze at any point early in the game in random spots. I disconnected the Hard Drive and I was able to get about 20min of bioshock compared to the 2-5min.This is a new HD 60GB unit I bought (official), i formatted and cleared the cache.
Any suggestions?
Xbox 360 freezing....
yeh, HDDs can be the source of quite a few problems. Both on the 360 and PCs cause thats where all information is stored (saves, boot up info etc)
Any suggestions?
Xbox 360 freezing....
yeh, HDDs can be the source of quite a few problems. Both on the 360 and PCs cause thats where all information is stored (saves, boot up info etc)
anyone wanna play borderlands
im a lvl 22 soldier, at the power to the people quest. Im sooo bored playin alone. i need someone to kill skags n bandits wit, my gamertag is Beelzemetalanyone wanna play borderlands
I liked Borderlands before it was cool.anyone wanna play borderlands
[QUOTE=''Grif-yes'']I liked Borderlands before it was cool.[/QUOTE]How bout now thats it's been released and you can actually play it?
When you hit the 30ish level i can play, (level 33, two and a half bars till 34) 1st playthrough. GT: xXDaErasaXx.wrinkles
I liked Borderlands before it was cool.anyone wanna play borderlands
[QUOTE=''Grif-yes'']I liked Borderlands before it was cool.[/QUOTE]How bout now thats it's been released and you can actually play it?
When you hit the 30ish level i can play, (level 33, two and a half bars till 34) 1st playthrough. GT: xXDaErasaXx.
Goodbye, Fable III.....
[url]http://www.gamespot.com/news/6237594.html?tag=latestheadlines;title;3[/url]yup...Goodbye, Fable III.....
The micro transactions in the game makes me cringe. It isn't confirmed yet, so I hope they ditch that awful idea.Goodbye, Fable III.....
Let me guess...because of Natal.
Let me ask you this. Do you honestly think that the entire game is going to be controlled by Natal? That the controller is a thing of the past? Are you imagining that to play Fable III, you're going to have to walk around your living room and make slashing motions to swing your weapons?
Or is it because of the microtransactions?
[QUOTE=''RoslindaleOne'']The micro transactions in the game makes me cringe. It isn't confirmed yet, so I hope they ditch that awful idea.[/QUOTE]Yeah, I hate it when games do this. I bought the game. That should include the WHOLE game.
I dont have a problem w/ microtransaction as long as it's not the only way to get good (or any)weapons. I assume they intend it for exclusive weapons, so all in all **** YOU LIONHEAD!
[QUOTE=''LittleEnid''][QUOTE=''RoslindaleOne'']The micro transactions in the game makes me cringe. It isn't confirmed yet, so I hope they ditch that awful idea.[/QUOTE]Yeah, I hate it when games do this. I bought the game. That should include the WHOLE game.[/QUOTE]
Microtransactions aren't a new thing. How would you feel of the game cost $30 or $40, but they had microtransactions? For instance, there are some MMORPG's that are free to play but in order to get some of the really cool upgrades and weapons, you have to pay for them through microtransactions. This is a very popular model in Korea.
[QUOTE=''DJ_Magneto'']Let me guess...because of Natal.
Let me ask you this. Do you honestly think that the entire game is going to be controlled by Natal? That the controller is a thing of the past? Are you imagining that to play Fable III, you're going to have to walk around your living room and make slashing motions to swing your weapons?
Or is it because of the microtransactions?[/QUOTE]
I was imagining that maybe they would make it for both. and I feel that making games like these for natal is an awful idea.....
[QUOTE=''DJ_Magneto''][QUOTE=''LittleEnid''][QUOTE=''RoslindaleOne'']The micro transactions in the game makes me cringe. It isn't confirmed yet, so I hope they ditch that awful idea.[/QUOTE]Yeah, I hate it when games do this. I bought the game. That should include the WHOLE game.[/QUOTE]
Microtransactions aren't a new thing. How would you feel of the game cost $30 or $40, but they had microtransactions? For instance, there are some MMORPG's that are free to play but in order to get some of the really cool upgrades and weapons, you have to pay for them through microtransactions. This is a very popular model in Korea.[/QUOTE]
It's an interesting idea but not what I come to expect from console games, especially Fable. I don't mind DLC expansions but the thought of paying real money for a sword or a rare tattoo card is not a good idea. I'd rather explore the game or shoot 50 gargoyles to get that rare item.
[QUOTE=''DJ_Magneto'']Let me guess...because of Natal.
Let me ask you this. Do you honestly think that the entire game is going to be controlled by Natal? That the controller is a thing of the past? Are you imagining that to play Fable III, you're going to have to walk around your living room and make slashing motions to swing your weapons?
Or is it because of the microtransactions?[/QUOTE]
Its probably the microtransactions.. and its complete bs. Buying weaponry or items with cash defeats the whole purpose of earning them in game, especially if they will be better than what you will get in game, but thats unknown as of now, here's hoping it will only be cosmetic, and perhaps only available after certain points in the game. Starting off with the ultimate weapon would be retarded.
The natal support shouldn't be used for more than a few interactions like the expression system (though some of these would be awkward to act out lol) or puzzle solving, I actually doubt itll be used in combat at all... unless there is an option to swap between natal combat or traditional controller combat, because the whole swinging a plastic sword around would be really dumb for hours on end.. as you pointed out yourself.
This is B*** **** I am NOT buying Natal for this! Hopefully you won't have to use Natal to play, but is instead, and option. lionhead=:'(
[QUOTE=''orb_03_2006''][QUOTE=''DJ_Magneto'']Let me guess...because of Natal.
Let me ask you this. Do you honestly think that the entire game is going to be controlled by Natal? That the controller is a thing of the past? Are you imagining that to play Fable III, you're going to have to walk around your living room and make slashing motions to swing your weapons?
Or is it because of the microtransactions?[/QUOTE]
I was imagining that maybe they would make it for both. and I feel that making games like these for natal is an awful idea.....[/QUOTE]
Well, the reason I ask that question about Natal is because I seem to be one of the few people on this forum that defends the use of Natal. Not because I think it will completely replace the controller for more traditional games like RPGs and FPS's. I DON'T believe that at all. While there will be some niche games out there that totally utilize it like that dodgeball game, as far as traditional games, I believe that any integration of Natal will be purely as an OPTIONAL ENHANCEMENT.
Anyone who has seen me in this forum has probably seen me rant on about this.
For instance, let's say you have 6 or 7 spells. To cast them, maybe you have a different hand motion for each. Or in an FPS with squad commands like in Rainbow Six, let's say you want to hold up your squad. You give them the military hand signal to halt. Just some examples. And again...OPTIONAL. I just don't believe that we are going to be running around our living rooms or running in place to play our more traditional games. Game developers themselves comment on how it just wouldn't work for some games.
I'm just saying, don't be so quick to dismiss anything to do with Natal until we see more of how it will be utilized. Because it's not going to completely replace our controllers.
Depends how they pull it off. Tiger Woods 09 had them... most people didn't notice because you could still get ALL the items in the game without it. As long as they follow this model I could care less if games have microtransactions in them. 1. It helps the slow kids. 2. It helps the developers if someone actually uses it. Which means they can keep making more games at the expense of #1. When it becomes unprofitable they can stop... or if they force you to use them to play the game, because then I'll stop.
I really hope they don't have microtransactions. I think it would really spoil the game.
[QUOTE=''DJ_Magneto''] Well, the reason I ask that question about Natal is because I seem to be one of the few people on this forum that defends the use of Natal. Not because I think it will completely replace the controller for more traditional games like RPGs and FPS's. I DON'T believe that at all. While there will be some niche games out there that totally utilize it like that dodgeball game, as far as traditional games, I believe that any integration of Natal will be purely as an OPTIONAL ENHANCEMENT. Anyone who has seen me in this forum has probably seen me rant on about this. For instance, let's say you have 6 or 7 spells. To cast them, maybe you have a different hand motion for each. Or in an FPS with squad commands like in Rainbow Six, let's say you want to hold up your squad. You give them the military hand signal to halt. Just some examples. And again...OPTIONAL. I just don't believe that we are going to be running around our living rooms or running in place to play our more traditional games. Game developers themselves comment on how it just wouldn't work for some games. I'm just saying, don't be so quick to dismiss anything to do with Natal until we see more of how it will be utilized. Because it's not going to completely replace our controllers.[/QUOTE] Yeah, I'm with you on the Natal part and those are some ideas for it too. I'm actually looking forward to see how they implement Natal into Fable 3.
[QUOTE=''raahsnavj'']Depends how they pull it off. Tiger Woods 09 had them... most people didn't notice because you could still get ALL the items in the game without it. As long as they follow this model I could care less if games have microtransactions in them. 1. It helps the slow kids. 2. It helps the developers if someone actually uses it. Which means they can keep making more games at the expense of #1. When it becomes unprofitable they can stop... or if they force you to use them to play the game, because then I'll stop.[/QUOTE]
I like how the Tiger Woods games use microtrasactions. It allows people like me who don't have all the time in the world to devote to one game a way to access certain content. Let's say there's a special driver that I need $200,000 in game dollars to buy. Or maybe you need to win so many tournaments in order to unlock the right to buy it. A microtransaction is an alternative to that. Now those hard core grinders like to criticize guys like me. ''You didn't put the time in. Waah Waah, blah blah blah.'' Well, I have a job. I have a social life. I have other games to play. I want to be able to use that cool Nike driver too or unlock that final golf course without having to put in 10 hours. With microtransactions, I have that option. Again, it's an OPTION.
I think this is going to be a way to just buy the DLC in-game, and not having to go out on to the dashboard and go through the menus.
I'll still be getting it, without Natal though.
I think Natal might make all the mini games more interesting. When you are starting off in Fable II getting money really depends on the mini games for the jobs which get very repative very quickly.
Natal might make them more interesting and give them a bit more variety. Then again you also might end up waving and thrusting at the screen and not getting anywhere like you do with some of the Wii games.
Of course this is if they decide to integrate Natal with Fable III at all,
selling out.
I still have yet to finish Fable 2, and was thinking of Fable 3 later, but no more.I dont care one bit about Natal. I would pick a regular controller over having to stand up and move around anyday. All the focus on graphics this gen takes enough away from the length of the game as it is. Focusing on graphics and motion controls, where is the room for any quality story at all?Most any game that uses RMT I would not buy just on principle. if im forking over all this money I expect the full game when i buy the disc. Add on extras are one thing, but when you are being nickle and dimed for almost everything little thing, hell no.
Don't you think because Natal is controlled by your body that they would have at least a controller to go with it? if not, they would make a 360 version.Seriously, whats wrong with Natal? looks like a great project
The micro transactions in the game makes me cringe. It isn't confirmed yet, so I hope they ditch that awful idea.Goodbye, Fable III.....
Let me guess...because of Natal.
Let me ask you this. Do you honestly think that the entire game is going to be controlled by Natal? That the controller is a thing of the past? Are you imagining that to play Fable III, you're going to have to walk around your living room and make slashing motions to swing your weapons?
Or is it because of the microtransactions?
[QUOTE=''RoslindaleOne'']The micro transactions in the game makes me cringe. It isn't confirmed yet, so I hope they ditch that awful idea.[/QUOTE]Yeah, I hate it when games do this. I bought the game. That should include the WHOLE game.
I dont have a problem w/ microtransaction as long as it's not the only way to get good (or any)weapons. I assume they intend it for exclusive weapons, so all in all **** YOU LIONHEAD!
[QUOTE=''LittleEnid''][QUOTE=''RoslindaleOne'']The micro transactions in the game makes me cringe. It isn't confirmed yet, so I hope they ditch that awful idea.[/QUOTE]Yeah, I hate it when games do this. I bought the game. That should include the WHOLE game.[/QUOTE]
Microtransactions aren't a new thing. How would you feel of the game cost $30 or $40, but they had microtransactions? For instance, there are some MMORPG's that are free to play but in order to get some of the really cool upgrades and weapons, you have to pay for them through microtransactions. This is a very popular model in Korea.
[QUOTE=''DJ_Magneto'']Let me guess...because of Natal.
Let me ask you this. Do you honestly think that the entire game is going to be controlled by Natal? That the controller is a thing of the past? Are you imagining that to play Fable III, you're going to have to walk around your living room and make slashing motions to swing your weapons?
Or is it because of the microtransactions?[/QUOTE]
I was imagining that maybe they would make it for both. and I feel that making games like these for natal is an awful idea.....
[QUOTE=''DJ_Magneto''][QUOTE=''LittleEnid''][QUOTE=''RoslindaleOne'']The micro transactions in the game makes me cringe. It isn't confirmed yet, so I hope they ditch that awful idea.[/QUOTE]Yeah, I hate it when games do this. I bought the game. That should include the WHOLE game.[/QUOTE]
Microtransactions aren't a new thing. How would you feel of the game cost $30 or $40, but they had microtransactions? For instance, there are some MMORPG's that are free to play but in order to get some of the really cool upgrades and weapons, you have to pay for them through microtransactions. This is a very popular model in Korea.[/QUOTE]
It's an interesting idea but not what I come to expect from console games, especially Fable. I don't mind DLC expansions but the thought of paying real money for a sword or a rare tattoo card is not a good idea. I'd rather explore the game or shoot 50 gargoyles to get that rare item.
[QUOTE=''DJ_Magneto'']Let me guess...because of Natal.
Let me ask you this. Do you honestly think that the entire game is going to be controlled by Natal? That the controller is a thing of the past? Are you imagining that to play Fable III, you're going to have to walk around your living room and make slashing motions to swing your weapons?
Or is it because of the microtransactions?[/QUOTE]
Its probably the microtransactions.. and its complete bs. Buying weaponry or items with cash defeats the whole purpose of earning them in game, especially if they will be better than what you will get in game, but thats unknown as of now, here's hoping it will only be cosmetic, and perhaps only available after certain points in the game. Starting off with the ultimate weapon would be retarded.
The natal support shouldn't be used for more than a few interactions like the expression system (though some of these would be awkward to act out lol) or puzzle solving, I actually doubt itll be used in combat at all... unless there is an option to swap between natal combat or traditional controller combat, because the whole swinging a plastic sword around would be really dumb for hours on end.. as you pointed out yourself.
This is B*** **** I am NOT buying Natal for this! Hopefully you won't have to use Natal to play, but is instead, and option. lionhead=:'(
[QUOTE=''orb_03_2006''][QUOTE=''DJ_Magneto'']Let me guess...because of Natal.
Let me ask you this. Do you honestly think that the entire game is going to be controlled by Natal? That the controller is a thing of the past? Are you imagining that to play Fable III, you're going to have to walk around your living room and make slashing motions to swing your weapons?
Or is it because of the microtransactions?[/QUOTE]
I was imagining that maybe they would make it for both. and I feel that making games like these for natal is an awful idea.....[/QUOTE]
Well, the reason I ask that question about Natal is because I seem to be one of the few people on this forum that defends the use of Natal. Not because I think it will completely replace the controller for more traditional games like RPGs and FPS's. I DON'T believe that at all. While there will be some niche games out there that totally utilize it like that dodgeball game, as far as traditional games, I believe that any integration of Natal will be purely as an OPTIONAL ENHANCEMENT.
Anyone who has seen me in this forum has probably seen me rant on about this.
For instance, let's say you have 6 or 7 spells. To cast them, maybe you have a different hand motion for each. Or in an FPS with squad commands like in Rainbow Six, let's say you want to hold up your squad. You give them the military hand signal to halt. Just some examples. And again...OPTIONAL. I just don't believe that we are going to be running around our living rooms or running in place to play our more traditional games. Game developers themselves comment on how it just wouldn't work for some games.
I'm just saying, don't be so quick to dismiss anything to do with Natal until we see more of how it will be utilized. Because it's not going to completely replace our controllers.
Depends how they pull it off. Tiger Woods 09 had them... most people didn't notice because you could still get ALL the items in the game without it. As long as they follow this model I could care less if games have microtransactions in them. 1. It helps the slow kids. 2. It helps the developers if someone actually uses it. Which means they can keep making more games at the expense of #1. When it becomes unprofitable they can stop... or if they force you to use them to play the game, because then I'll stop.
I really hope they don't have microtransactions. I think it would really spoil the game.
[QUOTE=''DJ_Magneto''] Well, the reason I ask that question about Natal is because I seem to be one of the few people on this forum that defends the use of Natal. Not because I think it will completely replace the controller for more traditional games like RPGs and FPS's. I DON'T believe that at all. While there will be some niche games out there that totally utilize it like that dodgeball game, as far as traditional games, I believe that any integration of Natal will be purely as an OPTIONAL ENHANCEMENT. Anyone who has seen me in this forum has probably seen me rant on about this. For instance, let's say you have 6 or 7 spells. To cast them, maybe you have a different hand motion for each. Or in an FPS with squad commands like in Rainbow Six, let's say you want to hold up your squad. You give them the military hand signal to halt. Just some examples. And again...OPTIONAL. I just don't believe that we are going to be running around our living rooms or running in place to play our more traditional games. Game developers themselves comment on how it just wouldn't work for some games. I'm just saying, don't be so quick to dismiss anything to do with Natal until we see more of how it will be utilized. Because it's not going to completely replace our controllers.[/QUOTE] Yeah, I'm with you on the Natal part and those are some ideas for it too. I'm actually looking forward to see how they implement Natal into Fable 3.
[QUOTE=''raahsnavj'']Depends how they pull it off. Tiger Woods 09 had them... most people didn't notice because you could still get ALL the items in the game without it. As long as they follow this model I could care less if games have microtransactions in them. 1. It helps the slow kids. 2. It helps the developers if someone actually uses it. Which means they can keep making more games at the expense of #1. When it becomes unprofitable they can stop... or if they force you to use them to play the game, because then I'll stop.[/QUOTE]
I like how the Tiger Woods games use microtrasactions. It allows people like me who don't have all the time in the world to devote to one game a way to access certain content. Let's say there's a special driver that I need $200,000 in game dollars to buy. Or maybe you need to win so many tournaments in order to unlock the right to buy it. A microtransaction is an alternative to that. Now those hard core grinders like to criticize guys like me. ''You didn't put the time in. Waah Waah, blah blah blah.'' Well, I have a job. I have a social life. I have other games to play. I want to be able to use that cool Nike driver too or unlock that final golf course without having to put in 10 hours. With microtransactions, I have that option. Again, it's an OPTION.
I think this is going to be a way to just buy the DLC in-game, and not having to go out on to the dashboard and go through the menus.
I'll still be getting it, without Natal though.
I think Natal might make all the mini games more interesting. When you are starting off in Fable II getting money really depends on the mini games for the jobs which get very repative very quickly.
Natal might make them more interesting and give them a bit more variety. Then again you also might end up waving and thrusting at the screen and not getting anywhere like you do with some of the Wii games.
Of course this is if they decide to integrate Natal with Fable III at all,
selling out.
I still have yet to finish Fable 2, and was thinking of Fable 3 later, but no more.I dont care one bit about Natal. I would pick a regular controller over having to stand up and move around anyday. All the focus on graphics this gen takes enough away from the length of the game as it is. Focusing on graphics and motion controls, where is the room for any quality story at all?Most any game that uses RMT I would not buy just on principle. if im forking over all this money I expect the full game when i buy the disc. Add on extras are one thing, but when you are being nickle and dimed for almost everything little thing, hell no.
Don't you think because Natal is controlled by your body that they would have at least a controller to go with it? if not, they would make a 360 version.Seriously, whats wrong with Natal? looks like a great project
EPIC new Left 4 Dead 2 Trailer (LINK INS ...
http://www.joystiq.com/2009/10/22/rumor-new-left-4-dead-2-cg-trailer-leaked-epic/After see'ing this, for 1, it was awesome, and for 2, see'ing the characters personalitys, I want to be that Con man. Nick I think?..At first I wanted that kid with the hat, but now see'ing he's a complaining hillbilly. I dont want to be him..XD..EPIC new Left 4 Dead 2 Trailer (LINK INS ...
Link works, dude's telling the truth.EPIC new Left 4 Dead 2 Trailer (LINK INS ...
Really nice cutscenes! Hope all of those are in the game.
could this be intro?
yeah, seen some stuff about it in Game Informer, looks sweet.
Oh man, so excited for this game. Between Team Fortress 2 and WaW I need something a bit different for multiplayer this should hold me off until AvsPredatorvsMarines comes out :) Splitscreen online coop? Oh yeah baby. :p (Although my beef is why can't they make more like that?)
:shock: OMG!
i dont this its worthy of ''epic'' IMO, i mean its dudes killing zombies.. o0o0o0o0o so0o0o0o epic.. i dont get the all the hype for this game
[QUOTE=''ACAClA'']i dont this its worthy of ''epic'' IMO, i mean its dudes killing zombies.. o0o0o0o0o so0o0o0o epic.. i dont get the all the hype for this game[/QUOTE]
Cool story bro.
By the way, I'm totally being the big black guy. I miss the old characters though. :(
[QUOTE=''RobboElRobbo''][QUOTE=''ACAClA'']
Cool story bro.[/QUOTE]
yeah i might write a book
Looked very interesting. I liked the cutscenes and I liked the way the chainsaw tore through the zombies it looked very satisfying.
That looks great but sadly Black Friday is coming up so I wont be buying it right away.
[QUOTE=''ACAClA'']i dont this its worthy of ''epic'' IMO, i mean its dudes killing zombies.. o0o0o0o0o so0o0o0o epic.. i dont get the all the hype for this game[/QUOTE]
I wish i could understand what your saying... anyway thats a bad#%$ commercial but were not going to see it on tv anyday lol unless they edit it.
[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]
''Hey maybe the helicopter is made of chocolate''Oh man that was priceless! :lol:
was on the fence about getting L4D2 at launch or waiting till christmas. after that trailer, I jumped in the car, drove to GS and am now eagerly waiting the Nov 17th midnight launch. lol
Too bad that CG trailer is probably 10x better than the actual game, like the first one. I remember seeing the intro for Left 4 Dead and thinking ''woah this game is going to be awesome'' and then being sorely dissapointed.
Wow... I think I've been reduced to three simple words. Me want... Shinny...
Looks awesome, hope they have more cutscenes like this during the missions to develop the characters a bit more than they did in L4D1.Cant wait for this!
Link works, dude's telling the truth.EPIC new Left 4 Dead 2 Trailer (LINK INS ...
Really nice cutscenes! Hope all of those are in the game.
could this be intro?
yeah, seen some stuff about it in Game Informer, looks sweet.
Oh man, so excited for this game. Between Team Fortress 2 and WaW I need something a bit different for multiplayer this should hold me off until AvsPredatorvsMarines comes out :) Splitscreen online coop? Oh yeah baby. :p (Although my beef is why can't they make more like that?)
:shock: OMG!
i dont this its worthy of ''epic'' IMO, i mean its dudes killing zombies.. o0o0o0o0o so0o0o0o epic.. i dont get the all the hype for this game
[QUOTE=''ACAClA'']i dont this its worthy of ''epic'' IMO, i mean its dudes killing zombies.. o0o0o0o0o so0o0o0o epic.. i dont get the all the hype for this game[/QUOTE]
Cool story bro.
By the way, I'm totally being the big black guy. I miss the old characters though. :(
[QUOTE=''RobboElRobbo''][QUOTE=''ACAClA'']
Cool story bro.[/QUOTE]
yeah i might write a book
Looked very interesting. I liked the cutscenes and I liked the way the chainsaw tore through the zombies it looked very satisfying.
That looks great but sadly Black Friday is coming up so I wont be buying it right away.
[QUOTE=''ACAClA'']i dont this its worthy of ''epic'' IMO, i mean its dudes killing zombies.. o0o0o0o0o so0o0o0o epic.. i dont get the all the hype for this game[/QUOTE]
I wish i could understand what your saying... anyway thats a bad#%$ commercial but were not going to see it on tv anyday lol unless they edit it.
[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]
''Hey maybe the helicopter is made of chocolate''Oh man that was priceless! :lol:
was on the fence about getting L4D2 at launch or waiting till christmas. after that trailer, I jumped in the car, drove to GS and am now eagerly waiting the Nov 17th midnight launch. lol
Too bad that CG trailer is probably 10x better than the actual game, like the first one. I remember seeing the intro for Left 4 Dead and thinking ''woah this game is going to be awesome'' and then being sorely dissapointed.
Wow... I think I've been reduced to three simple words. Me want... Shinny...
Looks awesome, hope they have more cutscenes like this during the missions to develop the characters a bit more than they did in L4D1.Cant wait for this!
Damn I miss Xbox
After it broke 3 time I sold it and got a PS3, but no one ever talks on PS3, I barely have any friends with PS3s, I miss playing GOW2 with friends and talking to them, I miss playing saints row while listening to music, I miss watching Jessica Chobot on strategize :( You cant even tell if random people are online or ofline on PSN, inviting people to games is like a F'ing project, reminds me of the old times when you had to type a long password for NES games :PAnyone else sold their 360 and got a PS3 ?I miss xbox WAAAHHHHHH!!!!!Damn I miss Xbox
ya i did but then sold my ps3 and went back to 360. glad too. i hated the slow download speeds, controller and no friends owning a ps3. never should have got rid of my 360 but its all good now. Damn I miss Xbox
You shouldn't be talking about the PS3 in the Xbox 360 forums. ;)
ya i did but then sold my ps3 and went back to 360. glad too. i hated the slow download speeds, controller and no friends owning a ps3. never should have got rid of my 360 but its all good now. Damn I miss Xbox
You shouldn't be talking about the PS3 in the Xbox 360 forums. ;)
Why is Halo 2 so much more fun than Halo ...
I havent played the xbox in years because mine broke, but I have the one for PC and its way more fun than Halo 3, coagulation 8 vs 8 CTF is the funnest gametype youll ever play in your entire LIFE! even on headlong, containment, waterworks, HALO 2 WAS FOR THE GENERALS OF BIG TEAM BATTLE, LONG LIVE BIG TEAM BATTLE..... LONG LIVE BIG TEAM BATTLE.......... LONG LIVE BIG TEAM BATTLE! dont tell me valhala is the new blood gultch because its NOT, have you ever had a color theory class kid? colors bring out emotions, do you even know what composite colors are?Why is Halo 2 so much more fun than Halo ...
Halo 2 is the best Halo game ever. ODST came close, but Halo 2 deliver everything new, like new weapons, new Characters (like Arbiter), Hijack vehicles, get Skulls, and the most of all, Xbox live (Multiplayer). Halo 2 did something special doing its time (Since it came out in 2004). I think all Halo games are awesome, but Halo 2 deliver everything new. Halo 3 is just Halo 2 with Upgrades, and of course, new Gametypes and Features (Which there awesome anyways). Either way, Halo 2 was the funnest, but every single Halo game is awesome and Bungie gets the job done.Why is Halo 2 so much more fun than Halo ...
That's quite a bold statement to be making, but I couldn't agree more. Great game, but to be honest it's but a memories past to me. I'm truly hoping that Bungie delivers with Reach considering that it's the last Halo game that they're developing. (Or did I read that right?)
Agreed Halo 2 was way more fun than Halo 3
[QUOTE=''Black-October'']That's quite a bold statement to be making, but I couldn't agree more. Great game, but to be honest it's but a memories past to me. I'm truly hoping that Bungie delivers with Reach considering that it's the last Halo game that they're developing. (Or did I read that right?)[/QUOTE]This... sort of. Halo1 is the best, sorry!!!Reach better bring new graphics and gameplay since Halo3 was in the sound and graphics department an absolute joke, and stale in the story, controls, and gameplay department.Dammit I want a run button!!! Plus they screwed up the pistols!!!!(I loved the Halo2 pistols, from what I hear i'm the only one)ODST was good but not deserving of the high reviewscores its recieved. Asfor competitive MP I'll stick to COD4 (till MW2)... Oh and the Master Chief isnt the last Spartan not according to the books, so why say he is or make fiction based in the universe with no connection to the games? Seems stupid. Dissapointing too.
I miss Blood Gulch. TC is right, Valhalla is no substitute. but i have to admit, I have played much more Halo 3 online than Halo 2.
[QUOTE=''YoungSinatra25''][QUOTE=''Black-October'']That's quite a bold statement to be making, but I couldn't agree more. Great game, but to be honest it's but a memories past to me. I'm truly hoping that Bungie delivers with Reach considering that it's the last Halo game that they're developing. (Or did I read that right?)[/QUOTE]This... sort of. Halo1 is the best, sorry!!!Reach better bring new graphics and gameplay since Halo3 was in the sound and graphics department an absolute joke, and stale in the story, controls, and gameplay department.Dammit I want a run button!!! Plus they screwed up the pistols!!!!(I loved the Halo2 pistols, from what I hear i'm the only one)ODST was good but not deserving of the high reviewscores its recieved. Asfor competitive MP I'll stick to COD4 (till MW2)... Oh and the Master Chief isnt the last Spartan not according to the books, so why say he is or make fiction based in the universe with no connection to the games? Seems stupid. Dissapointing too.[/QUOTE]I need to get around to reading the books. I feel as though I'm missing out quite a bit.I wouldn't go so far as to say that Halo 3 was stale, but it just wasn't the improvement needed for the franchise so instead it felt rehashed. Bungie could potentially do a lot with Halo: Reach and I'm crossing my fingers Bungie delivers a new and exciting experience.
i think Halo 2 had the much better maps; headlong, terminal, lockout, ascension, coag etc
halo 2 owns all the way... halo 3 owns to but not has much as 2. in my opinion half the maps on 3 is not that great compared to 2. dual weapons in halo 2 was useful and fun now in 3 they far less useful and fun. So many more flaws in my opinion that just makes the game play B.S and require less skill
[QUOTE=''chaoscougar1'']i think Halo 2 had the much better maps; headlong, terminal, lockout, ascension, coag etc[/QUOTE]They had Lockout (As Blackout), but it didn't turn out good so that was a disappointment of a Remake. Now good old Terminal, the good old Train that I use to wreck my Wraith with, good times, good times.
Yeah I agree that Halo 2 had the better maps. I didnt mind the story in Halo 3 though. Halo 2 was awesome up until you had to deal with the flood levels. Those were just annoying.
Halo 2 was fun but H3 is better when it comes competivness like MLG.
I don't get it. I thought they were about the same.
I liked the newmombasa map so much.
Halo 2 is better than Halo 3 for the same reasons that Halo is better than Halo 2.
Opinions, opinions, opinions.
Both were exceptional in their own ways.
[QUOTE=''YoungSinatra25''][QUOTE=''Black-October'']That's quite a bold statement to be making, but I couldn't agree more. Great game, but to be honest it's but a memories past to me. I'm truly hoping that Bungie delivers with Reach considering that it's the last Halo game that they're developing. (Or did I read that right?)[/QUOTE]This... sort of. Halo1 is the best, sorry!!!Reach better bring new graphics and gameplay since Halo3 was in the sound and graphics department an absolute joke, and stale in the story, controls, and gameplay department.Dammit I want a run button!!! Plus they screwed up the pistols!!!!(I loved the Halo2 pistols, from what I hear i'm the only one)ODST was good but not deserving of the high reviewscores its recieved. Asfor competitive MP I'll stick to COD4 (till MW2)... Oh and the Master Chief isnt the last Spartan not according to the books, so why say he is or make fiction based in the universe with no connection to the games? Seems stupid. Dissapointing too.[/QUOTE]Why do you need a sprint button?Smh, I don't see why every game needs a spring button these days. You just said Halo 1 was the best, I'm 1000% positive it didn't have a sprint button.Halo controls and gameplay are stale? Haha, wow.Competitive + COD = fail. COD isn't competitive, at all.
[QUOTE=''compose'']I havent played the xbox in years because mine broke, but I have the one for PC and its way more fun than Halo 3, coagulation 8 vs 8 CTF is the funnest gametype youll ever play in your entire LIFE! even on headlong, containment, waterworks, HALO 2 WAS FOR THE GENERALS OF BIG TEAM BATTLE, LONG LIVE BIG TEAM BATTLE..... LONG LIVE BIG TEAM BATTLE.......... LONG LIVE BIG TEAM BATTLE! dont tell me valhala is the new blood gultch because its NOT, have you ever had a color theory class kid? colors bring out emotions, do you even know what composite colors are?[/QUOTE]But what about funner game types in different games???
I actually like both a lot. I like Halo 3's balance so much more than Halo 2's though. But still, I really did enjoy the online modes for both Halo 2 and 3. Two of the best online games I've played man. Good stuff.
Halo 2 is the best Halo game ever. ODST came close, but Halo 2 deliver everything new, like new weapons, new Characters (like Arbiter), Hijack vehicles, get Skulls, and the most of all, Xbox live (Multiplayer). Halo 2 did something special doing its time (Since it came out in 2004). I think all Halo games are awesome, but Halo 2 deliver everything new. Halo 3 is just Halo 2 with Upgrades, and of course, new Gametypes and Features (Which there awesome anyways). Either way, Halo 2 was the funnest, but every single Halo game is awesome and Bungie gets the job done.Why is Halo 2 so much more fun than Halo ...
That's quite a bold statement to be making, but I couldn't agree more. Great game, but to be honest it's but a memories past to me. I'm truly hoping that Bungie delivers with Reach considering that it's the last Halo game that they're developing. (Or did I read that right?)
Agreed Halo 2 was way more fun than Halo 3
[QUOTE=''Black-October'']That's quite a bold statement to be making, but I couldn't agree more. Great game, but to be honest it's but a memories past to me. I'm truly hoping that Bungie delivers with Reach considering that it's the last Halo game that they're developing. (Or did I read that right?)[/QUOTE]This... sort of. Halo1 is the best, sorry!!!Reach better bring new graphics and gameplay since Halo3 was in the sound and graphics department an absolute joke, and stale in the story, controls, and gameplay department.Dammit I want a run button!!! Plus they screwed up the pistols!!!!(I loved the Halo2 pistols, from what I hear i'm the only one)ODST was good but not deserving of the high reviewscores its recieved. Asfor competitive MP I'll stick to COD4 (till MW2)... Oh and the Master Chief isnt the last Spartan not according to the books, so why say he is or make fiction based in the universe with no connection to the games? Seems stupid. Dissapointing too.
I miss Blood Gulch. TC is right, Valhalla is no substitute. but i have to admit, I have played much more Halo 3 online than Halo 2.
[QUOTE=''YoungSinatra25''][QUOTE=''Black-October'']That's quite a bold statement to be making, but I couldn't agree more. Great game, but to be honest it's but a memories past to me. I'm truly hoping that Bungie delivers with Reach considering that it's the last Halo game that they're developing. (Or did I read that right?)[/QUOTE]This... sort of. Halo1 is the best, sorry!!!Reach better bring new graphics and gameplay since Halo3 was in the sound and graphics department an absolute joke, and stale in the story, controls, and gameplay department.Dammit I want a run button!!! Plus they screwed up the pistols!!!!(I loved the Halo2 pistols, from what I hear i'm the only one)ODST was good but not deserving of the high reviewscores its recieved. Asfor competitive MP I'll stick to COD4 (till MW2)... Oh and the Master Chief isnt the last Spartan not according to the books, so why say he is or make fiction based in the universe with no connection to the games? Seems stupid. Dissapointing too.[/QUOTE]I need to get around to reading the books. I feel as though I'm missing out quite a bit.I wouldn't go so far as to say that Halo 3 was stale, but it just wasn't the improvement needed for the franchise so instead it felt rehashed. Bungie could potentially do a lot with Halo: Reach and I'm crossing my fingers Bungie delivers a new and exciting experience.
i think Halo 2 had the much better maps; headlong, terminal, lockout, ascension, coag etc
halo 2 owns all the way... halo 3 owns to but not has much as 2. in my opinion half the maps on 3 is not that great compared to 2. dual weapons in halo 2 was useful and fun now in 3 they far less useful and fun. So many more flaws in my opinion that just makes the game play B.S and require less skill
[QUOTE=''chaoscougar1'']i think Halo 2 had the much better maps; headlong, terminal, lockout, ascension, coag etc[/QUOTE]They had Lockout (As Blackout), but it didn't turn out good so that was a disappointment of a Remake. Now good old Terminal, the good old Train that I use to wreck my Wraith with, good times, good times.
Yeah I agree that Halo 2 had the better maps. I didnt mind the story in Halo 3 though. Halo 2 was awesome up until you had to deal with the flood levels. Those were just annoying.
Halo 2 was fun but H3 is better when it comes competivness like MLG.
I don't get it. I thought they were about the same.
I liked the newmombasa map so much.
Halo 2 is better than Halo 3 for the same reasons that Halo is better than Halo 2.
Opinions, opinions, opinions.
Both were exceptional in their own ways.
[QUOTE=''YoungSinatra25''][QUOTE=''Black-October'']That's quite a bold statement to be making, but I couldn't agree more. Great game, but to be honest it's but a memories past to me. I'm truly hoping that Bungie delivers with Reach considering that it's the last Halo game that they're developing. (Or did I read that right?)[/QUOTE]This... sort of. Halo1 is the best, sorry!!!Reach better bring new graphics and gameplay since Halo3 was in the sound and graphics department an absolute joke, and stale in the story, controls, and gameplay department.Dammit I want a run button!!! Plus they screwed up the pistols!!!!(I loved the Halo2 pistols, from what I hear i'm the only one)ODST was good but not deserving of the high reviewscores its recieved. Asfor competitive MP I'll stick to COD4 (till MW2)... Oh and the Master Chief isnt the last Spartan not according to the books, so why say he is or make fiction based in the universe with no connection to the games? Seems stupid. Dissapointing too.[/QUOTE]Why do you need a sprint button?Smh, I don't see why every game needs a spring button these days. You just said Halo 1 was the best, I'm 1000% positive it didn't have a sprint button.Halo controls and gameplay are stale? Haha, wow.Competitive + COD = fail. COD isn't competitive, at all.
[QUOTE=''compose'']I havent played the xbox in years because mine broke, but I have the one for PC and its way more fun than Halo 3, coagulation 8 vs 8 CTF is the funnest gametype youll ever play in your entire LIFE! even on headlong, containment, waterworks, HALO 2 WAS FOR THE GENERALS OF BIG TEAM BATTLE, LONG LIVE BIG TEAM BATTLE..... LONG LIVE BIG TEAM BATTLE.......... LONG LIVE BIG TEAM BATTLE! dont tell me valhala is the new blood gultch because its NOT, have you ever had a color theory class kid? colors bring out emotions, do you even know what composite colors are?[/QUOTE]But what about funner game types in different games???
I actually like both a lot. I like Halo 3's balance so much more than Halo 2's though. But still, I really did enjoy the online modes for both Halo 2 and 3. Two of the best online games I've played man. Good stuff.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)